BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//Laboratoire Inter-universitaire de Psychologie - ECPv6.15.17//NONSGML v1.0//EN
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
X-WR-CALNAME:Laboratoire Inter-universitaire de Psychologie
X-ORIGINAL-URL:https://www.lippc2s.fr
X-WR-CALDESC:Évènements pour Laboratoire Inter-universitaire de Psychologie
REFRESH-INTERVAL;VALUE=DURATION:PT1H
X-Robots-Tag:noindex
X-PUBLISHED-TTL:PT1H
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:Europe/Paris
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0200
TZNAME:CEST
DTSTART:20200329T010000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0200
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:CET
DTSTART:20201025T010000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0200
TZNAME:CEST
DTSTART:20210328T010000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0200
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:CET
DTSTART:20211031T010000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0200
TZNAME:CEST
DTSTART:20220327T010000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0200
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:CET
DTSTART:20221030T010000
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Paris:20210521T100000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Paris:20210521T120000
DTSTAMP:20260424T123607
CREATED:20250827T101027Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20250827T101027Z
UID:7552-1621591200-1621598400@www.lippc2s.fr
SUMMARY:Séminaire – Adam HAHN
DESCRIPTION:Towards a Better Understanding of Implicit Bias Beyond Unconsciousness and Dishonesty\nImplicit measures – the results of indirect computerized reaction-time attitude measurements such as the Implicit Associations Task (the “IAT”\, Greenwald\, McGhee\, & Schwartz\, 1998) – are often described as reflecting “attitudes that people are unable or unwilling to report” (e.g.\, www.projectimplicit.org). This suggests that people are either entirely unaware of their “unconscious” attitudes\, or unwilling to reveal them honestly. I will present a series of projects that questions the utility and veracity of both of those explanations and show that under many circumstances people are both willing and able to report on the evaluations reflected in implicit measures. Instead\, I will present a model that can explain divergences between implicit bias and explicit attitudes in terms of other psychological (attention\, failures in affective forecasting) and methodological (stimulus effects\, calibration) factors. These findings have implications for cognitive and applied social psychology. Theoretically\, they can lead to a better understanding of automaticity and consciousness in social cognition\, suggesting a distinction between three types of conscious awareness of one’s own cognitions. From an applied perspective\, a better understanding of the underlying cognitions can lead applied researchers to design more effective interventions targeted at acknowledgement of racial biases. Discussion will focus on how simplified and inaccurate explanations of implicit bias may not only be inaccurate\, but thwart the way for social-cognitive research to have an impact on important societal issues.  \nAdam HAHN (Bath University)\nWebsite: https://researchportal.bath.ac.uk/en/persons/adam-hahn
URL:https://www.lippc2s.fr/event/seminaire-adam-hahn/
CATEGORIES:Séminaire
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR